Filter/surface agitation question

Discuss specific plants, general plant care, help setting up a plant tank, rare plants, and general help
Post Reply
User avatar
Larry Grenier
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Manassas, VA, USA, Earth

Post by Larry Grenier »

I'm setting-up a heavily planted 58 gallon tank with a light fish load. I have an aquaclear 200 and a 300 available. Is there a problem with this type of filter for a heavily planted tank? Driving off C02 maybe?

Also, Ghazanfar, your PM box is full and no one can send you a PM <img border="0" src="smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0">      <edited><editID>Larry Grenier</editID><editDate>38008.7771296296</editDate></edited>
User avatar
Ghazanfar Ghori
Site Admin
Posts: 3258
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 5:26 am
Location: United States

Post by Ghazanfar Ghori »

Yep - with Hang-on-Back type filters, you'll get too
much agitation which will drive off the CO2.


Cleaned up my PM Inbox...sorry
-
Ghazanfar Ghori

Image
jerseyjay
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 12:58 am
Location: North Jersey

Post by jerseyjay »

If budget is tight and you can't afford canister filter, there is a way to modify your HOB filters.

Back in the days, when I had Emperor400 on 55G, I placed a coarse sponge (available in any LFS store) inside of intake tube and coarse sponge on the outlets. Of course your flow will be drastically decreased but your CO2 will remain in acceptable levels. <img border="0" src="smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0"> <edited><editID>Jay Luto</editID><editDate>38008.9182175926</editDate></edited>
User avatar
SCMurphy
Site Admin
Posts: 2104
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 1:40 pm
Real Name: Sean
Location: Maryland United States

Post by SCMurphy »

[QUOTE=Jay Luto] If budget is thight and you can't afford canister filter, there is a way to modify your HOB filters.

Back in the days, when I had Emperor400 on 55G, I placed a coarse sponge (available in any LFS store) inside of intake tube and coarse sponge on the outlets. Ofcourse your flow will <strong>be drastically increased </strong>but your CO2 will remain in acceptable levels. <img border="0" src="smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0"> [/QUOTE]

Am I reading this right? <img border="0" src="smileys/laughat.gif" border="0">
"したくさ" Sean

Aquascape? I'm a crypt farmer.

If you've got bait, I've got wasabi!

I wish I could be like Mr. Sarcastic when I grow up! ;)
User avatar
Larry Grenier
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Manassas, VA, USA, Earth

Post by Larry Grenier »

I believe he meant <strong>drastically decreased</strong> and I believe you meant to <strong>razz him</strong> a bit <img border="0" src="smileys/smiley2.gif" border="0">
jerseyjay
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 12:58 am
Location: North Jersey

Post by jerseyjay »

[QUOTE=SCMurphy]Am I reading this right?[/QUOTE]

hahah.
Quit breaking my balls Sean <img border="0" src="smileys/smiley35.gif" border="0">
Post Reply

Sponsors